Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Publisher blames Indian law for Hindu book removal

Posted by

Epigraph:

And if you are in doubt as to what We (Allah) have sent down to Our servant (Muhammad), then produce a Chapter like it, and call upon your helpers beside Allah, if you are truthful.  (Al Quran 2:24)

Without freedom of thought there can be no such thing as wisdom & no such thing as publick liberty without freedom of speech, Benjamin Franklin, 1722.

Without freedom of thought there can be no such thing as wisdom & no such thing as publick liberty without freedom of speech, Benjamin Franklin, 1722.

Source: BBC
Penguin’s decision to withdraw the book has been widely criticised

Related Stories

Penguin India has defended its decision to recall and destroy copies of a book on Hinduism by a prominent US scholar.

In its first comments on the row Penguin said it had to respect the laws of land, such as those which make it a crime to offend religious feeling.

Penguin also said it had a duty to protect its employees against threats.

Wendy Doniger’s book The Hindus: An Alternative History had been the subject of a legal challenge claiming the text was offensive to Hindus.

Hindu campaign group Shiksha Bachao Andolan brought a civil case in 2011 against Penguin India, arguing that the book contained “heresies” insulting to Hindus.

Penguin reached an apparent out-of-court agreement with the group, details of which were circulated online earlier this week.

The decision to withdraw the book sparked widespread criticism that it undermined free speech, with many asking why such a big company had given in to a little-known group, the BBC’s Andrew North reports from Delhi.

Continue reading the main story
image of Soutik BiswasSoutik Biswas India correspondent

“Start Quote

The fact that a top publisher has acceded to the demands of a fringe Hindu group has come as a shock to many…”

The publisher has not directly answered that question, but in its statement it said it had an obligation to respect the laws of the land “however intolerant or restrictive”.

India’s Penal Code makes it a criminal offence to deliberately outrage or insult “religious feelings” by spoken or written words, potentially putting Penguin India in a vulnerable legal position in the wake of the challenge by the Hindu group.

Penguin warned that such laws “will make it increasingly difficult for any Indian publisher to uphold international standards of free expression”.

But critics argue that Penguin should have defended its case further.

“There hasn’t been any court order. The settlement was signed before they went to Supreme Court. Of course, there is a problem with strange and ambiguous laws, but they didn’t fight it until the end,” Booker prize-winning author Arundhati Roy told the BBC.

Continue reading the main story

Additional Reading

Freedom of Speech: A Core Islamic Value!

Posted by on February 13, 2014. Filed under Asia,Free speach,Free Speech,Freedom,Hinduism,India,Separation of Church and State. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

3 Responses to Publisher blames Indian law for Hindu book removal

  1. Zia Shah

    February 15, 2014 at 2:52 am

    The book is available in Amazon. I just ordered a copy.

  2. Wasim A. Khan

    February 15, 2014 at 4:03 am

    Today, in every country or religion there are some or group who can not take criticism and they have no tolerence also. They are called phenatics. Such people take law in their hands and can do anything to harm any one, so its better to avoid them.

  3. Abdul

    February 15, 2014 at 1:36 pm

    I did not know about this book but all of us must remember the fatwa against Salman Rushdie and that against Taslima Nasreen

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>